Fourteen rules. Each rests on a study.

The research on AI and thinking mostly shows how tools make people think less. Read backwards, it is a design spec for a tool that does the opposite. That is this app.

Every number was checked against its source. If a study falls, its rule falls with it.

The rules

The app and the paper

Same question, two forms.

The paper asks who gets to say what a system means once a tool arrives. The app is where that question meets real people.

The desk and LiveCan one person see how the tool shaped the answer? The commit step and the R/W marks are the data.

The tableTwo people, one claim. The gap between their answers is a shared standard of evidence, observed live.

The weekly rhythmOne claim a week without the tool keeps the unaided baseline that experts lost without noticing.